[OpenTRV-dev] What else do i need

Stuart Poulton EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
Wed Apr 10 14:08:07 BST 2013


On 10/04/13 12:15, Mike Stirling wrote:
>   
>   
> ----------------original message-----------------
> From: "Stuart Poulton" EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> To: "Closed list for developer discussions" EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:43:24 +0100
> -------------------------------------------------
>   
>   
>> There are lots of options out there. And if we get it right
>> communication should be transport agnostic.
>>
> One of the reasons I was asking Ciseco about a CC430-based SRF. This would allow for a much more portable code base, e.g. with proper board abstraction the same code could target AVR + CC1101 or self-contained CC430. In the past I've found SDCC (for targeting the CC1110's 8051) pretty good, but not quite so portable.
>
> Mike

I'm of the opinion at this point that 'life is too short' adopting SRF + 
LLAP simplifies, and at the same time we're supporting a UK industry. 
Certainly thats where I'm putting my eggs.

Stuart


More information about the OpenTRV-dev mailing list