[OpenTRV-dev] OT: Voltage drops
Bo Herrmannsen
EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
Tue Jun 11 14:18:45 BST 2013
yep, 3phase is standard here (almost) 3phases+neutral+earth
2013/6/11 Stuart Poulton <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
> Bo,
>
> Can you clarify, are you talking about voltage and current measurement on
> a 3 phase supply ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On 11/06/13 14:07, Bo Herrmannsen wrote:
>
>> hmm... i think you are right.. its the phase shift part that will benefit
>> most from what i'm doing
>>
>>
>> i will also agree to that 0-100A is rather a hughe step... for me thats
>> far beyound what i need, i can draw a max of 16A amps on each of the
>> 3phases i got in the fuse box
>>
>> /bo
>>
>>
>> 2013/6/11 Kevin Wood <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN <mailto:
>> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**com <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>>>
>>
>> Indeed. Looking at the openenergy design, it's the current
>> monitoring side
>> that would be the largest source of error due to the fact that it
>> lacks
>> resolution, especially at low power levels. A couple of current ranges
>> rather than trying to do 0-100A in one range would help there (I think
>> someone's proposed a design to do just that somewhere).
>>
>> Measuring mains voltage through an off-the-shelf step-down transformer
>> with a purely resistive load takes us back into the comfort zone
>> of most
>> constructors as far as safety goes and I can't believe it
>> introduces much
>> of an error if calibrated. Maybe a bit of phase shift and
>> flattening of
>> the top of the waveform if the transformer is a bit close to
>> saturation?..
>> Not sure. Will have to have a play with that.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> > I think the question here is what are the benefits of 'almost error
>> > free' mains voltage measurements ?
>> >
>> > Then compare to the risks, biggest being death, or fire.
>> >
>> > Stuart
>> > ______________________________**_________________
>> > OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> > EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**uk<EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
>> <mailto:EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**opentrv.org.uk<EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
>> >
>> > http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/**listinfo/opentrv-dev<http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev>
>> >
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**uk <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
>> <mailto:EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**opentrv.org.uk<EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
>> >
>> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/**listinfo/opentrv-dev<http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**uk <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
>> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/**listinfo/opentrv-dev<http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN**uk <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/**listinfo/opentrv-dev<http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/pipermail/opentrv-dev/attachments/20130611/1e2875ce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the OpenTRV-dev
mailing list