[OpenTRV-dev] Possible basis of OpenTRV hub?

[Stuart Poulton]

How much free code space have you got ?
On 9 Apr 2014 19:50, "Bo Herrmannsen" <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> wrote:

> Yo Damon
>
> How hard do you think it is to extend OpenTRV to talk OEM'ish ?
>
>
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- From: Damon Hart-Davis
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:19 PM
> To: Closed list for developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [OpenTRV-dev] Possible basis of OpenTRV hub?
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for all the juicy RFM12 info: I have replicated it to a number of
> places where I (and others) might actually be able to find it again!
>
> Wow, my excuses may be evaporating!
>
> Rgds
>
> Damon
>
>
> On 9 Apr 2014, at 14:15, Kevin Wood <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> wrote:
>
>  I've actually just come across this, which looks to be quite a good
>> description of the Jeelib RFM12 implementation.
>>
>> http://jeelabs.org/2011/01/14/nodes-addresses-and-interference/
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
>> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/pipermail/opentrv-dev/attachments/20140409/158da874/attachment.html>