[OpenTRV-dev] Possible basis of OpenTRV hub?

Wed Apr 9 20:04:43 BST 2014

About 10kB currently.

Rgds

Damon

On 9 Apr 2014, at 19:51, Stuart Poulton <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> wrote:

> How much free code space have you got ?
> 
> On 9 Apr 2014 19:50, "Bo Herrmannsen" <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> wrote:
> Yo Damon
> 
> How hard do you think it is to extend OpenTRV to talk OEM'ish ?
> 
> 
> 
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- From: Damon Hart-Davis
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:19 PM
> To: Closed list for developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [OpenTRV-dev] Possible basis of OpenTRV hub?
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> Thanks for all the juicy RFM12 info: I have replicated it to a number of places where I (and others) might actually be able to find it again!
> 
> Wow, my excuses may be evaporating!
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Damon
> 
> 
> On 9 Apr 2014, at 14:15, Kevin Wood <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> wrote:
> 
> I've actually just come across this, which looks to be quite a good
> description of the Jeelib RFM12 implementation.
> 
> http://jeelabs.org/2011/01/14/nodes-addresses-and-interference/
> 
> Kevin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev