[OpenTRV-dev] IoT Communications Backhaul final thoughts?

[Damon Hart-Davis]

Right, but also effectively very limited shared bandwidth and possibly no go for commercial applications (eg esp encrypted data).

Would be interesting to adapt an OpenTRV unit to talk to that network but maybe not for this project.

Would I think be BAD to squirt stuff in a different format over the top and wipe out their usage.

Rgds

Damon

> On 8 Jun 2015, at 13:16, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> the idea behind it is ok
> 
> but it lacks security
> 
> but open dource so can just tweak it
> 
> Den mandag den 8. juni 2015 skrev Damon Hart-Davis <dhd at exnet.com>:
> Hi,
> 
> I hadn’t, but I am now, thank you!
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Damon
> 
> 
> > On 8 Jun 2015, at 09:55, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > have you looked at ukhasnet?
> >
> > Den mandag den 8. juni 2015 skrev Damon Hart-Davis <dhd at exnet.com>:
> > I’m hoping to soft-close D17 today http://www.earth.org.uk/note-on-IoT-comms-backhaul.html Last minute thoughts welcome!
> >
> > Rgds
> >
> > Damon
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> > OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
> > http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> > OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
> > http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev