[OpenTRV-dev] EU radio band 48

[Adrian Godwin]

Stuart:

It CAN cut it. The point is that usage of a previously successful solution
doesn't automatically certify yours.


On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Stuart Poulton <stuart at poulton.org.uk>
wrote:

> Damon,
>
> Don't see why RFM23B/69 won't cut it, it is after all what CurrentCost
> used in their hardware.
>
> Stuart
>
>
> On 08/06/16 11:35, Damon Hart-Davis wrote:
>
>> On 8 Jun 2016, at 10:54, Stuart Poulton <stuart at poulton.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Not sure if you're planning on CE approval ? But if not you need to make
>>> those purchasing clearly understand that they are buying a kit for
>>> construction, hence avoiding the problem of 'selling a product’
>>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> The aim is for this stuff is to be fully CE stamped and suitable for
>> consumers, so we’ll have to find a suitable already-stamped radio module
>> for that and have to manage that process separately (RFM23B/69 woin’t cut
>> it I think).  All part of the logistics fun!
>>
>> We won’t be in a sensible radio band for the US, so I think that we’d
>> have to make it clear that the radio version is not suitable as-is for that
>> market.
>>
>> Rgds
>>
>> Damon
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
>> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/pipermail/opentrv-dev/attachments/20160608/66d2dca6/attachment.html>