<div dir="ltr">1) - Whatever works for you guys.....<div><br></div><div>2) - Sure no problem</div><div><br></div><div>3) - Sounds interesting. But some details about what we'd actually be getting would be good.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Damon Hart-Davis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:damon@opentrv.uk" target="_blank">damon@opentrv.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
As soon as Mark and I have a moment to get stuff sorted properly (he is in Finland for the next few days) we’ll get stuff up and running.<br>
<br>
Note that this initial shop stock will be *devs only* so will be supplied without code, and with links to how to build and load code, eg with particular tags.<br>
<br>
We’ll work out how to get the Radbot consumer version back on the road later, still aiming for the original availability date.<br>
<br>
A couple of questions for everyone to help us get this stuff sorted:<br>
<br>
1) How would people like to pay? Bank transfer / Credit/debit card / cheques? (Each have pros and cons in terms of speed of setting stuff up.)<br>
<br>
2) Are people happy to pre-order for delivery the other side of Christmas?<br>
<br>
3) Are people happy to (say) get kit at a discount where one feature is not functioning, eg radio TX, or boost button, etc? We have a great variety of battle-tested stuff and not everyone needs every bit working, and frankly otherwise I may feel compelled to hoard! %^P<br>
<br>
Rgds<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Damon<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
> On 28 Nov 2016, at 09:40, Stuart Poulton <<a href="mailto:stuart@poulton.org.uk">stuart@poulton.org.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Ok, so I missed the 'A Web shop will be appearing soon'<br>
><br>
> Damon, any chance of some indicative pricing ?<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Stuart Poulton <<a href="mailto:stuart@poulton.org.uk">stuart@poulton.org.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
> Great to see lots of responses. On the basis of the info in this thread here's what we know so far.<br>
><br>
> - This thread came about following the cancellation of Crowdfunding the launch of RADBOT<br>
> - Most people are looking for 8-10 valves<br>
> - There are currently no details around the control of the boiler<br>
> - No details regarding what interface will be to for example a RaspberryPi (I suspect serial<->RF unit.<br>
> - No details on pricing<br>
> - No details on how to formally request hardware<br>
><br>
> Thanks to Damon and Mark for contributing from a 'commercial' perspective. Hopefully we'll all be able to move forward and get a working solution along with an active development community.<br>
><br>
> Stuart<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Dave Shaw <<a href="mailto:dave.shaw.kford@gmail.com">dave.shaw.kford@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Same situation here. Already got my motion sensors in each room and a predictive algorithm sorted just need the TRVs to take it to the next step. I would need 10 for a full house solution. Willing to contribute knowledge and cash if necessary!<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 28 Nov 2016 07:51, "Kairos" <<a href="mailto:kairosmedia@swissmail.org">kairosmedia@swissmail.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> At 20:20 27/11/2016, you wrote:<br>
> >Jason Pearce <<a href="mailto:jason@pearce.org.uk">jason@pearce.org.uk</a>> wrote: > I would need 7 (unless you no longer need a central thermostat with this solution, in which I would need 8) You want 8 then. The basic idea is that a single thermostat is actually very poor at controlling the system.<br>
><br>
> I have been following this project for some time and I would like to get hold of one unit for testing. In particular I want to find out:<br>
><br>
> -- How resilient the TRV is to wifi congestion/outage?<br>
> -- How reliable are the mechanical components.<br>
> -- How easy to integrate into a custom control system (say one based on an RPi).<br>
> -- What exactly "open" in "OpenTRV" means..<br>
><br>
> I'll be happy to pay for one, and will naturally submit any findings to whomever for their development work..<br>
><br>
> It isn't clear to me whether simply sending this email constitutes a resuest for a unit, or if there is a more formal request system...<br>
><br>
> ??<br>
><br>
> Nick<br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> OpenTRV-interest mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:OpenTRV-interest@lists.opentrv.org.uk">OpenTRV-interest@lists.<wbr>opentrv.org.uk</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/<wbr>listinfo/opentrv-interest</a><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> OpenTRV-interest mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:OpenTRV-interest@lists.opentrv.org.uk">OpenTRV-interest@lists.<wbr>opentrv.org.uk</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/<wbr>listinfo/opentrv-interest</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> OpenTRV-interest mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:OpenTRV-interest@lists.opentrv.org.uk">OpenTRV-interest@lists.<wbr>opentrv.org.uk</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/<wbr>listinfo/opentrv-interest</a><br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
OpenTRV-interest mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenTRV-interest@lists.opentrv.org.uk">OpenTRV-interest@lists.<wbr>opentrv.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/<wbr>listinfo/opentrv-interest</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>