[OpenTRV-dev] RX improvements

Damon Hart-Davis dhd at exnet.com
Fri Sep 11 07:51:52 BST 2015


Hi,

If you look at the flags actually switched on and off by each top level config you’ll be able to see that you could make yourself a new custom config that (for example) enables boiler and stats RX but no stats TX.

I’m hoping that by the time I’ve given it all a good shake around most of the bits will all fit in the box at once again…  RealSoonNow(TM).

Rgds

Damon


> On 10 Sep 2015, at 09:22, Damon Hart-Davis <dhd at exnet.com> wrote:
> 
> OK, I’ll need to understand your setup again.
> 
> The point that I was failing to convey by my hamfistedness, sorry, was that some options that were run-time configurable now also need explicit compile-time support because of code-space issues.
> 
> So you may have to use distinct builds in different boxes where that was not the case before.
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Damon
> 
> 
>> On 9 Sep 2015, at 20:37, gary.gladman at talktalk.net wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, 
>> 
>> In case I have created confusion when I said "NO communication reported from leaf to boiler hub" I was referring to what in my system is the OpenTRV acting as the notional "boiler" hub.
>> 
>> I used the V0p2_Generic_Config.h file as supplied with the baseline (see attached) to create the install that I loaded into each of my leaf and hub OpenTRV's. The pre-existing configuration in the OpenTRV's was left unchanged.
>> 
>> Regards Gary.
>> 
>> ----Original Message----
>> From: dhd at exnet.com
>> Date: 09/09/2015 10:19
>> To: "Closed list for developer discussions"<opentrv-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk>
>> Subj: Re: [OpenTRV-dev] RX improvements
>> 
>> 
>>> On 8 Sep 2015, at 20:27, Gary Gladman <gary at gladman.name> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Code compiles, I have installed it, BUT I am seeing NO communication reported from leaf to boiler hub though I am seeing communication with the respective valves.
>> 
>> Be aware that due to code size constraints a boiler hub is not necessarily a stats hub (and we anticipate that these will be separate boxes usually in fact) for example,
>> 
>> Could you please share the V0p2_Generic_Config.h file settings you used to build each box, here or with me privately?
>> 
>> I do need to steer the code back to primarily heating use on the HEAD very soon, apart from anything else to keep Bruno happy since he is upgrading his installation right now!  Not to mention that we need to get code deployed to the valves that we are starting to crank the production handle for…
>> 
>> Rgds
>> 
>> Damon
>> 
>> PS1. Deniz seems to have got a decent base code size for the AES code, which I’m hoping we can upload to the GitHub repo today and actually use on a bus stop very soon.
>> 
>> PS2. Yes, I think you and Deniz came up with v similar boards.txt which helpfully verified that I was simply being a scaredy-cat…  Thanks to both of you.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
>> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
>> 
>> 
>> <V0p2_Generic_Config.h>_______________________________________________
>> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
>> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
>> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
> 



More information about the OpenTRV-dev mailing list