[OpenTRV-dev] Should we be doing this for OTAESGCM?

[Jeremy Poulter]

It is probable worth while, but may need a little work.

IMHO it would be good to get some justification together as to what the
benefits of OTAESGCM are over other similar and compare things like code
size, memory usage, speed etc on similar hardware. Then hopefully this will
be a good proof that can be used to convince Mozilla (and others)
that OTAESGCM is a worth while project.

Jeremy

On 10 June 2016 at 16:44, Damon Hart-Davis <damon at opentrv.uk> wrote:

> https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2016/06/10/mozilla-will-fund-code-audits/
>
> Not that we are quite yet ‘vital to the continued functioning of the
> Internet’!
>
> Rgds
>
> Damon
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-dev mailing list
> OpenTRV-dev at lists.opentrv.org.uk
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/pipermail/opentrv-dev/attachments/20160610/b055b7ee/attachment.html>