[OpenTRV-interest] My progress so far

[EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN]

 Hi Damon,

Sounds simple on the face of it - I'm guessing you have a way of doing this in mind.

I will send the patches once I work out how to generate them, otherwise I will zip and send the code as it exists.
 
Rgds

Gary

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Damon Hart-Davis <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
To: Open, non-developer list for interested parties <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
Sent: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:22
Subject: Re: [OpenTRV-interest] My progress so far


Hi Gary,

Wow!  Thanks for all of that!

Can you construct and mail me patches so that I can think about stuff and merge 
non-controversial stuff in, eg that light-shift bug by the sound of it…

Rgds

Damon


On 5 Oct 2014, at 14:49, Gary Gladman <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I have had most of my stuff set up for some time. Radiator actuators built and 
fitted, relay built, 1 OpenTRV boxed, 1 OpenTRV in position, central heating 
adapted but not yet connected.
>  
> I have been modifying the OpenTRV code base (as of commit 3253) to varying 
degrees of success and completeness ...
>  
> Fixed a couple of bugs (dont ask I dont truly remember)
> Introduced a concept of date.
> Adjusted target temp to vary by "month" (ala nichol graphs)
> Begun to refactor and make the code marginally more object orientated and 
starting to encapsulate certain concepts e.g. light, temp, RTC
> Adjusted target temp so that for example 21 means 21C8 rather than the 
original 21CF.
> Tried to limit increases in code size and made space optimisations to 
compensate
> Begun to move target temp towards fractions of a degree rather than degrees to 
support fractional adjustments to target temp under certain special scenarios.
>  
> My problem I suspect will soon become how to feed these back in the main line 
and/or remain aligned with the next round of updates e.g. SHT21 where the 
implementation doesn't seem to be going quite where I expected.
>  
> Any comments?
>  
> Regards Gary
>  
> PS Remembered one of the bugs was that the core stats for light was miscaled  
i.e. >> 4 when it should have been >> 2.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-interest mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest

_______________________________________________
OpenTRV-interest mailing list
EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/pipermail/opentrv-interest/attachments/20141006/3c734f80/attachment.html>