[OpenTRV-interest] My progress so far

[Damon Hart-Davis]

Hi,

If in any doubt, just zip up the files that you have edited, email them to me, and I’ll do the rest.

Thanks

Damon


On 6 Oct 2014, at 20:47, EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN wrote:

> Hi Damon,
> 
> Sounds simple on the face of it - I'm guessing you have a way of doing this in mind.
> 
> I will send the patches once I work out how to generate them, otherwise I will zip and send the code as it exists.
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Gary
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Damon Hart-Davis <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
> To: Open, non-developer list for interested parties <EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN>
> Sent: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:22
> Subject: Re: [OpenTRV-interest] My progress so far
> 
> Hi Gary,
> 
> Wow!  Thanks for all of that!
> 
> Can you construct and mail me patches so that I can think about stuff and merge 
> non-controversial stuff in, eg that light-shift bug by the sound of it…
> 
> Rgds
> 
> Damon
> 
> 
> On 5 Oct 2014, at 14:49, Gary Gladman <
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> > wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >  
> > I have had most of my stuff set up for some time. Radiator actuators built and 
> fitted, relay built, 1 OpenTRV boxed, 1 OpenTRV in position, central heating 
> adapted but not yet connected.
> >  
> > I have been modifying the OpenTRV code base (as of commit 3253) to varying 
> degrees of success and completeness ...
> >  
> > Fixed a couple of bugs (dont ask I dont truly remember)
> > Introduced a concept of date.
> > Adjusted target temp to vary by "month" (ala nichol graphs)
> > Begun to refactor and make the code marginally more object orientated and 
> starting to encapsulate certain concepts e.g. light, temp, RTC
> > Adjusted target temp so that for example 21 means 21C8 rather than the 
> original 21CF.
> > Tried to limit increases in code size and made space optimisations to 
> compensate
> > Begun to move target temp towards fractions of a degree rather than degrees to 
> support fractional adjustments to target temp under certain special scenarios.
> >  
> > My problem I suspect will soon become how to feed these back in the main line 
> and/or remain aligned with the next round of updates e.g. SHT21 where the 
> implementation doesn't seem to be going quite where I expected.
> >  
> > Any comments?
> >  
> > Regards Gary
> >  
> > PS Remembered one of the bugs was that the core stats for light was miscaled  
> i.e. >> 4 when it should have been >> 2.
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenTRV-interest mailing list
> > 
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> 
> > 
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-interest mailing list
> 
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest
> _______________________________________________
> OpenTRV-interest mailing list
> EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN
> http://lists.opentrv.org.uk/listinfo/opentrv-interest